🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.